Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539851›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Mapping ecological targets and outcome evaluations in arts-based interventions for women survivors of domestic violence: a scoping review.

Xingcen Liu, Kamal Sabran

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xingcen LiuSchool of the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Kamal SabranSchool of the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestic violence remains a major public health challenge with profound consequences for women survivors. Arts-based interventions are increasingly incorporated into community services as culturally responsive recovery approaches for marginalized populations; however, it remains unexamined whether quantitative evaluation frameworks adequately capture their broad intended outcomes. This scoping review mapped the literature on arts-based interventions for survivors, examining the ecological alignment-or potential evaluative tension-between stated objectives and quantitative evaluation metrics. Conducted following established scoping review methodology and reporting guidelines, systematic searches of Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO identified 12 eligible empirical studies. Data were charted using the Social Ecological Model across individual, interpersonal, and community levels. Findings revealed interventions were predominantly community-integrated, with objectives extending beyond psychological symptom reduction to encompass peer connection, cultural belonging, and collective healing. While individual-level recovery was evaluated using congruent psychological measures, broader interpersonal and community-oriented goals were less consistently represented. This revealed an evaluative tension, wherein relational and community outcomes were only partially reflected in formal quantitative assessments. Although arts-based interventions operate across multiple ecological levels, current evaluations remain disproportionately focused on individual psychological outcomes. Future research and policy initiatives may benefit from developing ecologically responsive measurement approaches that capture relational and community-level outcomes alongside clinical measures, thereby providing rigorous evidence to inform the funding, implementation, and evaluation of public health programs for women survivors of domestic violence.

Indexed as

Art TherapyDomestic ViolenceOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurvivorsFemaleHumansarts-based interventionsdomestic violenceoutcome evaluationscoping reviewsocial ecological model

Identifiers

PMID42539851
PMCPMC13424411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.