ArticleSAGE open nursing
Nursing Teachers' Experiences of Bachelor Thesis Group Supervision: A Qualitative Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Supervision of degree theses is a central activity in Higher Education. Writing a Bachelor thesis (BT) is often described as a challenging process for undergraduate nursing students. Previous research on academic supervision has primarily focused on individual aspects at the master's and doctoral levels rather than nursing teachers' experiences of BT supervision. Objective: This study explores nursing teachers' experiences of Bachelor thesis group supervision in nursing education. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing teachers from four universities in the middle of Sweden Results: The overall theme of the analysis is Different ways of organising and structuring supervision, supported by two subthemes: Finding and developing one's role as a supervisor and Promoting students' academic learning. Supervisors shape their roles through guidelines, syllabi, insights from colleagues, co-supervision, and personal experience. Supervisors feel a strong sense of personal responsibility and co-responsibility for their students' progress. Flexibility is necessary, as not everything can be standardised. Conclusion: The findings underscore the complexity of the supervisory role and the need for clear organisational frameworks, while flexibility and personal adaptation are key to supporting students effectively. The development of pedagogical supervisory skills is an ongoing process, and organisational support plays a critical role in ensuring supervisors can feel satisfaction and continue to develop in their roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.