ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Post-infection physeal bar resection of the proximal tibia: a case report and narrative review of the literature.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The formation of physeal bars following growth plate injuries can cause complications such as limb length discrepancies and angular or physeal deformities. Physeal bars usually form after fractures but can also develop due to infectious processes. Management strategies depend on factors such as the bar's location, extent and residual growth potential. We describe the case of a two-year-old female with a lower limb discrepancy and a slight varus knee deformity caused by a proximal tibial physeal bar due to a neonatal infection. The severe anatomical epiphyseal anomaly of her right proximal tibia had developed into a consistent joint irregularity. At 26 months old, the patient underwent a physeal bar resection, assisted by arthroscopy and intraoperative C-arm imaging. This minimally invasive technique facilitated safe, accurate removal of the lesion, avoiding any resection of healthy physeal cartilage. Postoperative outcomes were favourable, including restored range of knee motion and full symptom resolution. This approach demonstrated the clinical value of integrating arthroscopy equipment assistance with intraoperative C-arm imaging during the surgical treatment of physeal bars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.