ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2026
Pelvico-Sacro-L1 Angle: An Index for Rapid Evaluation of Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the Pelvico-Sacro-L1 angle (PSLA) as a direct parameter for assessing PI-LL mismatch as a key determinant of sagittal balance. Methods: In this retrospective study, adult patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) underwent spinopelvic lateral radiography. The pelvic sagittal line angle (PSLA) was defined as the angle between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the center of the superior endplate of S1 and the superior endplate of L1. The deviation from 90° was termed the modified PSLA, proposed as an alternative to the pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. Two independent orthopaedic surgeons measured the spinopelvic parameters and repeated the assessments four weeks later to evaluate intraobserver reliability. Results: A total of 92 patients (average age: 57.4 ± 9.9 years, 50 females) were included. The Bland-Altman plot indicated no significant systematic difference between the two measurement sets, suggesting good agreement between methods. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for PSLA in both inter- and intraobserver reliability was greater than 0.9, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusion: The PSLA demonstrated a strong agreement with the PI-LL mismatch, confirming the reliability of this approach, which provides a more straightforward and easily interpretable measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.