ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Exploring a root cause analysis team's experience with involving patients and next of kin after a sentinel event.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a growing recognition among healthcare providers and policymakers of the importance of involving patients and their next of kin in root cause analysis (RCA) to improve patient safety and healthcare quality. However, such involvement is intricate and challenging. This study explored how the involvement of patients and next of kin influenced the RCA team's understanding of a fatal sentinel event in maternity care. Method: The study was a qualitative exploratory single-case study combining document analysis with interviews with six RCA team members. The selected case came from a Norwegian hospital responding to a sentinel event involving the unexpected death of a child during childbirth. The study addressed the following research questions: What were the team's experiences of involving patients and next of kin in the RCA process? Data collection included twelve interviews with six RCA team members, which were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Four main themes were identified. These concerned: (1) uncertainty regarding whether bereaved parents should be involved in the RCA process; (2) challenges associated with conducting interviews with the parents; (3) incorporation of patient and next-of-kin perspectives into the RCA report; and (4) the RCA team's learning process following involvement of the parents. Conclusion: The findings suggest that involving patients and next of kin in RCA processes may contribute perspectives that strengthen organisational learning and understanding of sentinel events. Future research should explore how RCA frameworks can be systematically adapted to accommodate the involvement of bereaved relatives across different healthcare contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.