Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026

Sequential reaching in older adults: vibrotactile feedback improves preparation and movement control.

Saba Mohammadalinezhad Kolahdouz, Quinn Malone, Steven R Passmore, Jonathan J Marotta, Cheryl M Glazebrook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saba Mohammadalinezhad KolahdouzPerceptual Motor Integration Lab, Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Quinn MaloneSensorimotor Physiology and Integrative Neuromechanics, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Steven R PassmorePerceptual Motor Behavior Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jonathan J MarottaPerception & Action Lab, Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Cheryl M GlazebrookPerceptual Motor Integration Lab, Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Age-related motor decline is particularly evident during complex movements that require sequencing and bimanual coordination. The one-target advantage (OTA), in which single-target movements are typically initiated faster than the first segment of a two-target sequence, provides a useful framework for assessing planning demands in older adults. Methods: We examined whether task complexity and brief auditory or vibrotactile feedback delivered at the first target contact influence sequential reaching performance in 24 older adults (67.46 ± 5.41 years). Participants completed one- and two-target reaching tasks under three feedback conditions (no feedback, auditory feedback, or vibrotactile feedback) across movement types varying in complexity, including extension, reversal, unimanual, and bimanual movement sequences. Outcome measures included movement preparation, movement execution, movement transitions, kinematic measures, and endpoint accuracy. Results: Vibrotactile feedback selectively improved performance by shortening reaction time in the unimanual extension task relative to one-target movements, effectively reversing the typical OTA pattern. Vibrotactile feedback also increased peak velocity and altered kinematic control during the second movement segment. In contrast, movement time to the first target remained unchanged, whereas movement time to the second target increased with task complexity and was longest during bimanual conditions. Endpoint accuracy and consistency remained stable across feedback and task conditions, indicating that the kinematic benefits of vibrotactile feedback did not occur at the expense of either endpoint accuracy or endpoint consistency. Discussion: Overall, brief vibrotactile cues enhanced movement preparation and kinematic control in older adults during sequential reaching, particularly under higher coordination demands.

Indexed as

agingaudio feedbackaugmented feedbackmotor activityvibration

Identifiers

PMID42539734
PMCPMC13424289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.