ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
When prevention science meets politics: a case study of macrosystem barriers to school-based CSEC prevention.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) is a critical public health issue in the United States, yet rigorous evaluations of primary prevention programs remain scarce. While ecological systems theory highlights the importance of macrosystem influences (e.g., policy, political climate), these factors are rarely examined as direct barriers to prevention implementation and evaluation. Objective: This paper describes a community-based participatory research (CBPR) case study of Project LIVE-a federally funded, school-based CSEC prevention trial in a public school district in a midsized Midwestern city-to examine how macrosystem-level forces disrupted program implementation and compromised the feasibility of rigorous evaluation. Methods: Drawing on a multi-year (2022-2027) CDC-funded initiative, we synthesize recruitment and retention data, implementation records, and contextual documentation across an open pilot trial and a planned quasi-experimental design. Using an ecological systems framework, we analyze how federal, state, and district-level policies and events shaped study outcomes. Results: Despite strong community partnerships, high program relevance, and extensive recruitment efforts, enrollment and retention were insufficient to support planned analyses (e.g., <13% post-test completion in the quasi-experimental phase). Key barriers included a state-mandated shift from passive to active guardian consent, federal immigration enforcement policies that heightened fear among immigrant communities, mass federal workforce reductions affecting grant oversight, and substantial school district administrative instability. These macrosystem disruptions cascaded across micro, meso, and exosystems, ultimately leading to early termination of programming. Conclusions: Findings underscore the critical yet underexamined role of macrosystem forces in shaping the feasibility and success of school-based prevention research. Even well-funded, theoretically grounded, and community-engaged interventions may fail under conditions of political instability and policy misalignment. Future prevention science should incorporate assessments of policy context, community readiness, and structural risk, and prioritize flexible, adaptive designs capable of withstanding macro-level disruptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.