Observational studyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in deep neck space infections: a retrospective study of 32 patients.
Observational study in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep neck space infections (DNSI) are rapidly progressive suppurative conditions in which early identification of causative pathogens is critical for clinical decision-making. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients with DNSI. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 32 patients with radiologically confirmed DNSI who underwent surgical drainage between October 2023 and August 2025 were included. Intraoperative purulent specimens were analyzed using both conventional bacterial culture and mNGS. A composite clinical reference standard integrating clinical presentation, imaging findings, surgical observations, inflammatory markers, and expert assessment was used to evaluate the clinical relevance of detected microorganisms. Results: mNGS detected microbial DNA in 84.4% of patients and demonstrated a broader pathogen detection spectrum and shorter reporting time than conventional culture, particularly for anaerobic and fastidious organisms. Frequently detected organisms included Prevotella spp. and Streptococcus constellatus. Interpretation of these findings required careful consideration of anatomical involvement, organism abundance, and prior antimicrobial exposure to distinguish clinically relevant pathogens from colonizing organisms or residual nonviable DNA. Discordant findings between culture and mNGS, including culture-positive/mNGS-negative and dual-negative cases, were observed and likely reflected differences in sampling adequacy, organism viability, sequencing depth, and methodological limitations. Antimicrobial therapy was adjusted in selected patients following mNGS reporting. Discussion: mNGS may serve as a valuable adjunct to conventional microbiological diagnostics by expanding pathogen detection in selected DNSI cases, particularly when fastidious or anaerobic organisms are involved. However, its results should be interpreted cautiously in the context of clinical and microbiological findings. Prospective controlled studies are needed to further define the clinical role of mNGS in the management of DNSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.