ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Conservative plausibility-filtered SMOTE for credit card fraud detection under extreme class imbalance.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting credit card fraud is a complex tabular learning problem due to the underrepresentation of fraudulent events, extreme class imbalance, and scattered minority areas. To address this limitation, a conservative minority synthesis strategy is proposed, combining the removal of minority outliers, synthetic data generation using SMOTE, geometric filtering, and supervised plausibility filtering. Unlike conventional oversampling, the method does not seek to artificially balance classes but rather to retain only locally consistent and discriminatively useful synthetic samples. The approach was evaluated on the ULB Credit Card Fraud Detection and IEEE-CIS Fraud Detection datasets using a 60/20/20 stratified partitioning, preventing information leakage between training, calibration, and testing. On ULB, the proposal retained 638 final synthetic samples, raising the fraud rate of the augmented dataset to 0.005396. In IEEE-CIS, 947 final synthetic samples were retained, with a final fraud rate of 0.037563. Compared to techniques such as SMOTE, Borderline-SMOTE, ADASYN, and SimpleVAE, the proposed method showed competitive performance, achieving the highest AUPRC in four of six classifiers in ULB and in three of six classifiers in IEEE-CIS. Ablation analyses and statistical validation show that supervised plausibility filtering helped control the quality of the generated samples, although its benefit is not uniform and depends on the classifier and dataset used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.