ArticlePlant diversity2026
Niche evolution and asymmetric diversification in elm species (Ulmaceae).
Article in Plant diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global patterns of species diversity are highly heterogeneous, and even within the same evolutionary lineage, species richness can differ markedly. Understanding the mechanisms underlying such disparities remains a central question in evolutionary biology and biogeography. Here, we investigate the evolutionary drivers of asymmetric diversity and distribution patterns in Ulmaceae by integrating molecular phylogenetics, fossil evidence, climatic niche analyses, and biogeographic reconstructions. We reconstructed a time-calibrated, species-level phylogeny encompassing 86.21% of extant Ulmaceae species and incorporating 61 fossil taxa. Phylogenetic analyses supported the division of Ulmaceae into a temperate clade and a tropical clade, which differ substantially in species richness, climatic niche characteristics, and geographic distributions. The temperate clade exhibited strong climatic niche conservatism combined with a broader niche breadth, enabling repeated intercontinental dispersal and geographic expansion across the Northern Hemisphere since the Late Cretaceous. In contrast, the tropical clade shows more constrained niche evolution and limited dispersal capacity, remaining largely restricted to low-latitude tropical regions and exhibiting lower species richness. Fossil-integrated analyses suggest that Ulmaceae originated in northern temperate regions during the Late Cretaceous and experienced extensive intercontinental exchanges during the Paleogene, particularly via the Bering and North Atlantic land bridges. Diversification-rate analyses indicated that net diversification rates in both clades remained relatively stable through time. This pattern suggested that long-term differences in species richness were better explained by early climatic niche divergence and contrasting biogeographic histories, rather than by temporal shifts in diversification rates. Our study highlights the critical role of fossil integration in revealing deep-time evolutionary processes that shape modern plant diversity under long-term climatic change, and provides a framework applicable to many other extant lineages with similar distribution patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.