Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539569›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Prediction of female reproductive tract infections risk among college-going young adult women in Delhi using explainable artificial intelligence.

Joyeta Ghosh, Ravi Kant, Priya Bhardwaj, Sumathi Muralidhar, Myron Christodoulides, Jyoti Taneja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joyeta Ghosh *Department of Dietetics and Applied Nutrition, Amity Institute of Applied Sciences (AIAS) Amity University-Kolkata Campus, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Ravi Kant *Computational Drug & Vaccine Discovery Laboratory, Faculty of Applied Sciences & Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Priya BhardwajDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sumathi MuralidharApex Regional STD Centre, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Myron ChristodoulidesMolecular Microbiology, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jyoti TanejaLaboratory of Reproductive Epidemiology and Infection Immunology, Department of Zoology, Daulat Ram College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) pose a substantial economic burden and public health concern in developing countries such as India, where inadequate early detection and prevention strategies often lead to increased morbidity, mortality, stigma, cancer and adverse reproductive health outcomes in both men and women. Methods: The present cross-sectional study employed machine-learning models to predict the risk of RTI/STI among young women in Delhi, India, by analysing self-reported symptoms along with demographic, reproductive health, lifestyle, and hygiene-related factors. The data were analysed using multiple machine learning algorithms, including decision trees, random forest, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), stochastic gradient descent (SGD), and XGBoost. Prior to analysis, the data was preprocessed through different steps including missing-value imputation, outlier removal using the interquartile range (IQR) method, and the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance. Results: A comparative analysis of model performance revealed that the XGBoost algorithm achieved the highest accuracy (89.1%) and the greatest area under receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC = 0.935), with random forest performing strongly as the second-best model (accuracy = 87.6%, ROC-AUC = 0.921), demonstrating its strong ability to capture non-linear relationships among RTI risk factors. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified family medical history, personal RTI history, and menstrual cycle characteristics as the most influential predictors. Discussion: The findings underscore the potential of machine learning-driven predictive models in RTI risk stratification, screening support, and hypothesis generation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)machine learning (ML)public health surveillancereproductive tract infections (RTIs)risk predictionsexually transmitted infections (STIs)women health

Identifiers

PMID42539569
PMCPMC13424196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.