Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539558›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The relationship between social anxiety and problematic smartphone use: the serial mediation model of perceived social support and smartphone use frequency.

Chen Liu, Zhiqiang Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen LiuTianjin Sino-German University of Applied Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Zhiqiang HaoOffice of International Affairs, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Parents and educators have long been concerned about the development and consequences of problematic smartphone use (PSU) among students, especially college students who have more free time at their disposal. Few studies have explored the correlational association between social anxiety and PSU via potential statistical linkage pathways. This study explored correlational associations between social anxiety and PSU and tested a serial statistical mediation model including perceived social support and smartphone use frequency. Methods: An online survey was conducted among college students from a university in China using the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Smartphone Use Frequency Scale, and the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version. A total of 597 valid questionnaires were obtained (72.86% male). The serial mediation analysis was performed using Hayes' PROCESS macro (Model 6). Results: The results indicated that social anxiety and smartphone use frequency were positively correlated with PSU; perceived social support was negatively correlated with both social anxiety and PSU. All correlation coefficients reached a statistically significant level (all Conclusion: In the correlational model, perceived social support and smartphone use frequency exhibited a statistically significant serial indirect association pattern linking social anxiety and PSU; these correlational findings provide a reference for PSU prevention research.

Indexed as

AnxietyInternet Addiction DisorderSmartphoneSocial SupportStudentsAdolescentChinaFemaleHumansMaleMediation AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adultcollege studentsperceived social supportproblematic smartphone useserial mediation modelsmartphone use frequencysocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID42539558
PMCPMC13424113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.