Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539555›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026

How long should athletes with high range of motion demands stretch? Acute stretching durations for flexibility and performance: a systematic review.

Ismail Belli, Mohammad Alghosi, Morteza Bagheri Kalayeh, Erfan Abdollahzadeh, Fatemeh Heidari, Ramila Abedi Azar, Mohammad Alimoradi, Mojtaba Iranmanesh, Elham Hosseini, Andreas Konrad

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ismail BelliDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Haliç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mohammad AlghosiDepartment of Physical Education, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran.
Morteza Bagheri KalayehDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Erfan AbdollahzadehDepartment of Sports Injury and Corrective Movements, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Kish International, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh HeidariDepartment of Sport Sciences, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.
Ramila Abedi AzarLaboratory for Robotic Research, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AlimoradiDepartment of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Mojtaba IranmaneshDepartment of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Elham HosseiniDepartment of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Andreas KonradInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, Graz University, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stretching is a common practice among athletes in sports requiring high flexibility, but the optimal duration and type of stretching to enhance performance while minimizing potential drawbacks remains unclear. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the acute effects of different stretching durations and techniques-specifically static, dynamic, and combined methods-on flexibility and performance in athletes engaged in flexibility-dependent sports. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted up to March 2026. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 627 athletes from sports such as gymnastics, swimming, wrestling, dance, and track and field. Data were synthesized using thematic analysis and percentage-weighted mean changes with 95% confidence intervals, comparing pre- to post-intervention outcomes or intervention groups to controls (depending on study design). Moderating variables such as stretching type and duration were also considered. Results: Static stretching produced moderate improvements in flexibility from pre- to post-intervention (2.97%) and a moderate improvement when compared to control (2.36%), but was associated with small negative performance effects pre to post (-0.88%) and trivial declines compared to control (-0.07%). Dynamic stretching showed small flexibility gains (0.77%) compared to control, and small improvements in performance (0.55%). Combined protocols resulted in small positive effects on both flexibility (1.65%) and performance (0.60%). PNF interventions produced a small positive effect on performance (1.04%) when compared to control conditions. Regarding duration, short-duration stretching (≤60 s) led to a small flexibility improvement compared to control (0.79%), with trivial performance gains pre to post (0.06%) and compared to control (0.48%). Long-duration stretching (>60 s) yielded large flexibility improvements pre to post (6.21%) and a small improvement compared to control (1.89%), but small performance declines pre to post (-1.80%) and trivial effects relative to control (-0.02%). However, the majority of included studies were rated as low quality (15/23), and findings should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion: Stretching duration affects flexibility and performance. Long static stretching boosts flexibility but slightly reduces performance, while dynamic stretching enhances readiness with minimal flexibility gains. Protocols should match sport-specific demands and session goals. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/, identfier CRD42025635493.

Indexed as

athletic preparationflexibility enhancementmuscle performancerange of motion optimizationstretching protocols

Identifiers

PMID42539555
PMCPMC13423734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.