Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539554›Full record

ArticleNPJ sustainable agriculture2026

By-products of insect farming as a novel sustainable biofertilizer for crops.

Katherine Y Barragán Fonseca, Daan Mertens, Pedro Beschoren da Costa, Joop J A van Loon, Marcel Dicke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ sustainable agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine Y Barragán Fonseca *Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Daan Mertens *Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pedro Beschoren da CostaLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Joop J A van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of sustainable high-yield farming practices is crucial to support a growing human population while providing long-term solutions for the environmental impact of intensified agriculture. Nutrient-rich bio-residuals generated through the industrial production of insects hold a high but underexplored potential as an alternative to less sustainable fertilizers. In a two-year field experiment, we show that mustard plants grown in insect-exuviae-amended soil perform as well or even better than plants grown in soil amended with reference organic fertilizers. Improved plant performance was driven by increased plant growth in terms of height and width, a larger number of flowers produced, more interactions with pollinators, and a larger seed production compared to untreated plants. A parallel greenhouse experiment revealed that native root-associated microbial communities in exuviae-amended soil were more species-rich, less variable, and were characterized by several well-known plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria compared to those found in unamended soil or soil treated with reference fertilizer. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that valorizing insect-based bio-residuals can improve agricultural sustainability while simultaneously supporting a circular economy.

Indexed as

EcologyEnvironmental sciencesMicrobiologyPlant sciences

Identifiers

PMID42539554
PMCPMC13423803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.