ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
The evolution of phonemic verbal fluency test: bridging tradition with contemporary insights.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phonemic verbal fluency tests are a long-standing part of neuropsychological assessment. Although these tests are widely used to assess an individual's executive control and lexical retrieval potential, theoretical complexity behind them has not been sufficiently addressed in literature. Total word count remains the common metric, as earlier theoretical assumptions had shaped how the paradigm was operationalized. However, research and clinical practice have gradually revealed the insufficiency of this metric. This review aims to disentangle the test's interdisciplinary underpinnings by analyzing its psychological, linguistic, and neuroscientific foundations. Our assessment of the verbal fluency test's application uncovers apparent discrepancies between the conventional approach to interpreting test's data and recent paradigmatic shifts within each discipline. Having identified the critical discrepancy between the conventional interpretation of verbal fluency data and contemporary paradigmatic shifts across these disciplines we argue that phonemic fluency assessment should move beyond the total score to a systematic analysis of rich and variable response patterns, which may offer valuable insights into complex cognitive-linguistic processes. To conclude, embracing the inconsistencies between the current understanding of the cognitive processes measured by the test and its historical foundations may increase its diagnostic and research value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.