Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539518›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of biomedical science2026

Immunohistochemical testing of GISTs using CD117 markers: the UK NEQAS ICC & ISH external quality assessment data show significant differences in the performance of methods in regular use.

Andrew Dodson, Suzanne Parry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of biomedical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew DodsonUK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immunocytochemistry and In-Situ-Hybridisation (UK NEQAS ICC & ISH), London, United Kingdom.
Suzanne ParryUK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immunocytochemistry and In-Situ-Hybridisation (UK NEQAS ICC & ISH), London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CD117 (c-KIT) is a tyrosine kinase receptor protein, mutations in which are important in the tumourigenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). Immunohistochemical detection of CD117 is the primary identifying feature in its diagnosis. Introduction: UK NEQAS ICC & ISH conducts an EQA programme for CD117 expression in GIST. Between May-2020 and May-2025, 20 runs of this EQA were undertaken. The archived data was analysed to look for evidence regarding the quality of testing and associations between primary antibodies and stain quality. Discussion: Total submissions were 2,656 (mean per run = 132.8; range = 125-140). The number of submissions awarded a quality score indicating at least acceptable stain quality was 2,642 (99.5%). The total number of submissions that failed was 14 (mean proportion per run = 0.5%; range = 0.0%-2.4%); those obtaining a borderline score totalled 158 (mean proportion = 5.9%; range = 0.7%-10.9%); those obtaining an acceptable score totalled 394 (mean proportion = 14.8%; range = 4.3-24.4%); and those obtaining a good/excellent score totalled 2,090 (mean proportion = 78.7%; range = 57.7%-94.2%). There was a strong trend for the proportion of submissions obtaining a good/excellent quality score to increase over time. Four primary antibodies were used: Clone 9.7 (102 submissions, 3.9%), YR145 (263 submissions, 10.0%), EP10 supplied by Leica Biosystems (EP10(LB), 415 submissions, 15.8%), EP10 supplied by Roche Diagnostics (EP10(RD), 505 submissions, 19.2%), and a polyclonal antiserum supplied by Agilent Dako (1,263 submissions, 48.1%). A total of 76 submissions (2.9%) that used other primaries or suppliers were excluded from analysis. Conclusion: Demonstration of CD117 overexpression in GIST was undertaken to a very high quality standard in the majority of laboratories. For users of Dako Agilent supplied automation the highest quality staining was produced by using the polyclonal antiserum from the same supplier. Among users of Leica Biosystems and Roche Diagnostics automation the best staining was produced by using primary sourced from the same supplier that provided their automation. It is recommended that Clone 9.7 (Roche Diagnostics) should not be used as the results it produced were statistically significantly inferior to those of all other antibodies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsImmunohistochemistryProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitHumansUnited KingdomBiomarkers, TumorKIT protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitCD117EQAexternal quality assessmentGISTimmunohistochemistryquality

Identifiers

PMID42539518
PMCPMC13423735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.