Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539502›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2026

Lead Reimplantation Utilizing the Pre-existing Lead Tract: A Case Report of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Fracture Management.

Masaki Ujihara, Masahito Kawabori, Kazuyoshi Yamazaki, Taichi Nomura, Katsuki Eguchi, Shinichi Shirai, Ichiro Yabe, Miki Fujimura

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Masaki UjiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masahito KawaboriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuyoshi YamazakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Otaru General Hospital, Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan.
Taichi NomuraDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsuki EguchiDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shinichi ShiraiDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ichiro YabeDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Miki FujimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation lead fracture may necessitate intracranial lead replacement. If deep brain stimulation was clinically effective before the fracture, reimplantation along the original trajectory to the same target is preferable; however, detailed technical descriptions remain limited. We present a 70-year-old woman with Parkinson disease who underwent subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation. Two months after surgery, partial impedance abnormalities were detected on the left lead. At 12 months, all contacts demonstrated abnormal impedance, accompanied by worsening motor symptoms. Fourteen months after the initial surgery, we attempted to place a new lead by manually advancing it through the scar tissue that had formed along the original lead tract. Stereotactic reimplantation using a Leksell frame was prepared as a contingency if this scar-guided approach proved unsuccessful. After reopening the prior incision, the original lead was removed without resistance, and the cortical entry point was clearly identified. The preinserted stylet was removed from a new deep brain stimulation lead, which was then gently advanced through the original entry point along the pre-existing tract without reinsertion of the stylet. The lead progressed smoothly, and C-arm fluoroscopy confirmed that the tip corresponded to the prior position. Intraoperative test stimulation improved symptoms without adverse effects. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed that the reimplanted lead was positioned in an almost identical location to the prior lead. Stimulation was resumed with clinical benefit, and lead function remained normal at 6 months. Scar-guided reinsertion may represent a practical alternative; however, stereotactic backup should remain readily available, as adequate tract formation cannot be reliably predicted preoperatively.

Indexed as

deep brain stimulationlead fracturelead reimplantation scartissue frameless

Identifiers

PMID42539502
PMCPMC13423724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.