ArticleTelemedicine reports
Adapting a Poststroke Sedentary Behavior Intervention for Remote Delivery: Lessons from a Formative Descriptive Case Series.
Article in Telemedicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Activating Behavior for Lasting Engagement (ABLE) is a conversation-based intervention designed to reduce poststroke sedentary time. Remote delivery may overcome access barriers but requires adaptations to promote participant engagement and safety. We explored the feasibility of delivering ABLE remotely (teleABLE) using synchronous videoconferencing. Methods: Community-dwelling ambulatory stroke survivors ( Results: Most stroke survivors (median age = 56.5 years, median chronicity = 6.2 months poststroke) were retained through postintervention (90.9%). Feasibility benchmarks for safety (0 severe adverse events), participant satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 score = 3.7 vs. 3.0), and session frequency (1.7 sessions per week vs. 1.5) were met. Some participants experienced within-person change in sedentary time, activity engagement, and health-related quality of life. Participants characterized teleABLE as a useful planning process that contributed to re-engagement in activities and improved mental health. Conclusion: Intervention adaptations focused on structures to support participant engagement and safety during remotely delivered intervention. Clinical outcomes and qualitative data suggest that teleABLE may contribute to psychosocial outcomes such as disability adjustment and mental well-being. Future research is required to determine the efficacy of teleABLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.