ArticlePalliative medicine reports
Quality Improvement to Promote Advance Care Planning for Young Adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in Palliative medicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive neuromuscular disease. With improved life expectancy of patients with DMD, the need for advance care planning (ACP) has been identified by patients and providers. A quality improvement effort to address this gap was initiated at an academic children's hospital where patients are seen within a multidisciplinary neuromuscular clinic, which integrates palliative care into visits starting at age 18. The team followed outcome measures of (1) health care power of attorney (HCPOA) paperwork completion and (2) code status order documentation from baseline rates of 29% and 6%, respectively, between August 2024 and August 2025 for patients with DMD aged 18 or older. Methods: Identified key drivers included provider awareness of prior ACP conversations, documentation workflow, and patient readiness for conversations. Interventions included: creation of a DMD ACP Checklist, provider education, weekly e-mails, and access to state-specific ACP documents. Results: 123 visits were reviewed over 13 months. Improvement interventions led to a centerline shift for both outcome measures, with an increase from 29% to 68% for HCPOA paperwork completion and from 6% to 72% for code status order documentation. Conclusions: This project demonstrated that many young adults with DMD were open to ACP conversations, as reflected in improved rates of HCPOA paperwork completion and code status order documentation. However, some families continued to express discomfort with topics surrounding end-of-life. Further exploration is needed to understand how to best address these challenges in order to provide goal-concordant care with disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.