ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Vedolizumab in biologic-naïve ulcerative colitis: a multicenter real-world evaluation of clinical benefits and exploratory inflammatory indices.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Although vedolizumab (VDZ) serves as a primary biologic for ulcerative colitis (UC), long-term data in Chinese biologic-naïve cohorts and cost-effective prognostic biomarkers remain lacking. We evaluated the 54-week clinical benefits of VDZ as a first-line biologic in a Chinese cohort and investigated the clinical utility of systemic immune-inflammation indices (SII, NLR, PLR) in reflecting long-term outcomes and systemic inflammatory clearance during treatment de-escalation. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled biologic-naïve UC patients receiving VDZ. The primary endpoint was week-54 clinical remission, primarily evaluated using the full analysis set (FAS) with last observation carried forward (LOCF), accompanied by non-responder imputation (NRI) as a supplemental extreme-scenario analysis. Baseline indices were evaluated for predictive value, alongside an exploratory longitudinal analysis for patients undergoing early treatment de-escalation. Results: Among 41 patients in the FAS, the 54-week drug retention rate was 76.8%. Clinical remission was 73.2% (primary FAS-LOCF), with a conservative NRI estimate of 46.3%. In the paired endoscopy subgroup, 83.3% achieved endoscopic remission. While baseline SII and NLR correlated positively with C-reactive protein, they lacked robust predictive value for long-term remission. Instead, shorter disease duration was the sole independent predictor (OR = 0.84, Conclusions: Vedolizumab as a first-line biologic provides substantial clinical benefits and safety in bio-naive UC patients. While baseline inflammatory indices lack predictive power, their dynamic decline parallels clinical improvement. Due to the retrospective reliance on clinical symptoms and high rates of missing endoscopic data, these exploratory findings warrant cautious interpretation and prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.