ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Health financing strategies for achieving Universal Health Coverage in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face persistent health financing challenges, including heavy out-of-pocket payments, fragmented risk pools, and constrained fiscal space that undermine financial protection and equitable access to care. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes evidence on health financing strategies in LMICs, examining how revenue generation, risk pooling, and strategic purchasing can advance Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English-language publications from January 2016 to February 2026, supplemented by policy documents from international health organizations. Of 120 records identified, 58 full texts were assessed and 24 sources were included, comprising systematic reviews, country case studies, and policy analyses across sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. A formal risk-of-bias appraisal was not applied; instead, sources underwent a structured credibility assessment. Results: Tax-based financing and subsidized insurance models appear more consistently associated with coverage expansion and financial protection when supported by adequate public funding, mandatory inclusion, and large risk pools. Social health insurance contributes to equity only where enrollment is mandatory and premiums for the poor and informal workers are subsidized. Community-based insurance plays a complementary rather than cornerstone role, while donor funding and innovative mechanisms offer supplementary support but raise concerns about sustainability and scale. Across settings, fragmented, voluntary, and out-of-pocket-dominated arrangements are repeatedly linked to weaker financial protection. Conclusion: No single financing model is sufficient for UHC. The evidence suggests that integrated, tax-anchored systems with consolidated risk pools, strategic purchasing, and strengthened governance represent the most plausible pathway for LMICs, though financing reform alone cannot guarantee progress, since service readiness, workforce capacity, and governance determine whether financial coverage becomes effective coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.