ArticlePalliative medicine reports
Underrecognition of Delirium in Palliative Care: A Retrospective Comparison Between Cancer and Noncancer Patient Populations.
Article in Palliative medicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delirium is associated with high mortality and substantial patient distress; therefore, early identification and management are crucial. Among patients with cancer receiving palliative care, delirium is highly prevalent yet often underrecognized by attending physicians. Recently, palliative care for patients with noncancer conditions has gained attention. Nonetheless, the prevalence of delirium and the extent of physician awareness in this population remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify these aspects in noncancer patient populations to raise awareness among physicians and provide insights to improve palliative care delivery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1540 inpatients receiving palliative care at a university hospital in Japan between January 2018 and December 2023. Psychiatric diagnoses, referral reasons, physical diagnoses, and demographic information were analyzed. Results: In the noncancer group, the number of annual referrals to palliative care increased during the study period (from 7 to 66). Both the cancer and noncancer groups were commonly referred for pain, dyspnea, anxiety, insomnia, and delirium. Compared with the cancer group, the noncancer group was more likely to receive a psychiatric diagnosis (45.7% vs. 57.6%) and had a higher prevalence of delirium (12.9% vs. 21.5%). In the noncancer group, the proportion of referrals citing psychiatric symptoms was higher (38.5% vs. 54.2%), whereas the frequency of delirium underrecognition was comparable to that in the cancer group (59.6% vs. 71.0%). Conclusion: Underrecognition of delirium in palliative care settings is a common issue in both cancer and noncancer patient populations. Enhancing physician awareness may improve palliative care quality in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.