ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Case Report: Bullous erythema multiforme induced by omalizumab.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bullous erythema multiforme (BEM) is an acute immune-mediated mucocutaneous disease, with drug induction being one of its common causes. Omalizumab, a recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting free IgE, is widely used in chronic spontaneous urticaria and asthma due to its favorable safety profile, while severe cutaneous bullous adverse reactions induced by it are extremely rare. We report a 36-year-old female patient with a history of bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and chronic spontaneous urticaria who developed generalized wheals. After the first subcutaneous injection of omalizumab 300 mg, multiple raised, edematous erythematous papules and plaques, vesicles, and bullae appeared on the trunk, limbs, palms, soles, and oral mucosa 17 days later, accompanied by fever, chills, and fatigue. Laboratory examinations showed elevated eosinophil count and IgE level, and skin biopsy from the left upper limb revealed focal epidermal necrotic keratinocytes, intraepidermal and subepidermal blister formation, and massive eosinophilic infiltration. The patient was diagnosed with omalizumab-induced BEM. Initial treatment with methylprednisolone combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was ineffective. The condition was successfully controlled after increasing the dose of methylprednisolone and adding oral upadacitinib. This case suggests that omalizumab may induce BEM, and combination therapy with high-dose glucocorticoids and JAK inhibitors may be an effective strategy for refractory cases. Clinicians should be alert to such rare adverse reactions when using omalizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.