Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539365›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)

A Cross-Sectional Study of COVID-19 Impacts on Faculty in Academic Health Care: Lessons Learned to Help Navigate the Current National Institutes of Health Financial Crisis.

Danielle Roubinov, Cristina Calderon, Laura Muratore, Jennifer L Kerns, Reshma Jagsi, Brian Alldredge, Christina Mangurian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle RoubinovDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Cristina CalderonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Laura MuratoreDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jennifer L KernsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brian AlldredgeDepartments of Clinical Pharmacy and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Christina MangurianDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9839-652X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 significantly disrupted academic health care, with evidence suggesting disproportionate impacts on women versus men faculty. Understanding these gender-based differences can inform institutional policies to support equity, a priority amid the current climate, where reduced research funding and limitations to health care access are reshaping the scientific and clinical landscape. Objective: To examine gender differences in pandemic-related professional impacts, caregiving responsibilities, institutional supportive services, and mitigation strategies among faculty at a large academic health care center during COVID-19. Methods: All eligible faculty ( Results: Of 824 respondents (57% response rate), 768 were included in the analyses. Women faculty were significantly more likely than men to report increases in teaching/mentoring (36% vs. 26%) and clinical work (42% vs. 32%), as well as missed career opportunities (31% vs. 20%). Women faculty assumed more childcare (64% vs. 50%) and eldercare (16% vs. 8%) responsibilities during the pandemic. The majority of faculty (78%) did not utilize institutional support services during COVID-19, and qualitative responses suggest substantial barriers to access. Discussion: Women faculty experienced disproportionate professional and caregiver burdens during the first year of the pandemic. There are long-term implications for gender equity that may bear particular relevance as institutions confront current constraints across clinical and research domains. The findings are used to guide recommendations for how institutions can develop and sustain equity-focused faculty support policies to weather the current financial crisis.

Indexed as

faculty well-beinggender disparitiesorganizational supportpromotion and advancementworkforce equity

Identifiers

PMID42539365
PMCPMC13420397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.