ArticleNeurotrauma reports
Characterizing Neurologic Recovery after Acute Complete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Relation to Hemodynamic Management with Lumbar Intrathecal Drains.
Article in Neurotrauma reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In acute spinal cord injury (SCI) patients who had lumbar intrathecal catheters inserted for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage and augmentation of spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP), we sought to characterize how neurologic recovery was related to aspects of this hemodynamic management approach. This prospective multi-center nonrandomized interventional clinical trial was conducted at eight level-1 trauma centers in North America with specialized units for SCI care. Twenty-seven patients presenting with motor-sensory complete SCI (AIS grade A) had catheters inserted for up to 7-days post-injury for CSF drainage and SCPP augmentation. Mean arterial pressure, intrathecal pressure (ITP), SCPP, ITP waveform morphology, and CSF drainage volume were collected hourly. Neurologic assessments were repeated at 6-months post-injury to determine if AIS grade conversion/improvement had occurred. Hemodynamic measures associated with the outcome of being an AIS grade "converter" or "non-converter" were compared. Of the 27 AIS A participants at baseline, 8 experienced neurologic recovery reflected by AIS grade conversion at 6-month follow-up (converters); 19 remained AIS A (non-converters). Converters were characterized by a higher ITP, lower SCPP, greater CSF drainage volume, and a more pulsatile ITP waveform morphology than nonconverters. In patients with AIS A SCI, AIS grade conversion at 6 months was associated with a specific pattern of hemodynamic measures that we hypothesize reflect a complete decompression and restoration of CSF flow in the subarachnoid space at the injury site. These metrics may provide guidance and/or targets for future studies on the management of acute SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.