ArticleNeurotrauma reports
Cardiovascular Responses to Bladder and Bowel Distension after Human Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Neurotrauma reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pilot Feasibility Trial of Multi-Program Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Bladder Function Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bladder and bowel distention are primary triggers of autonomic dysreflexia in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), with reports of systolic blood pressure (SBP) rising by more than 20 mmHg and remaining elevated, with intolerable symptoms. The goal of the current study was to quantify the degree of cardiovascular changes, as well as the presence/absence and type of symptomatic indices, in a controlled laboratory setting during bladder filling (urodynamics) and bowel distention (anorectal manometry [ARM]). A total of 56 individuals (35 males and 21 females) with SCI participated in the study, with injury levels ranging from C2 to L3 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades A-D. Filling cystometry (CMG) and ARM were conducted on separate days, and continuous arterial blood pressure (BP) was acquired throughout. International SCI datasets for bladder and bowel function were also completed. The data indicate that 90.9% of individuals had a maximum change in SBP above 20 mmHg during CMG (group mean of 45 mmHg) and 85.4% of individuals had a maximum change in SBP above 20 mmHg during ARM (group mean of 37 mmHg). One or two symptoms (goosebumps, sweating, flushing, chills, tingling, and headache) occurred in 43.6% of participants during CMG and 23.6% during ARM, with higher rates reported in the dataset questionnaires. The maximum changes in SBP typically occurred at maximum vesicle pressure and/or at first sensation during CMG, and during balloon catheter insertion or withdrawal during the ARM procedure. These data, taken together, indicate that urodynamic and bowel assessments in individuals with SCI should include measures of BP and be considered in daily management practices, as the frequent triggering of cardiovascular changes likely impacts health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.