Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539283›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

When does more data help? Spectral Geometry and Scaling Laws in MRI Transformers.

Tamoghna Chattopadhyay, Kartik Shelar, Sophia Thomopoulos, Paul M Thompson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamoghna ChattopadhyayImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States.
Kartik ShelarImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States.
Sophia ThomopoulosImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0046-4070
Paul M ThompsonImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States.

Funding

Ultrascale Machine Learning to Empower Discovery in Alzheimers Disease BiobanksU01AG068057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Heng Huang · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
High Capacity, High Performance Storage System for NeuroscienceS10OD032285 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2022 to 2022
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068057NIH HHS S10 OD032285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaling laws describe how model performance improves as the amount of training data increases, and recent theories such as the zeta law suggest that scaling behavior is influenced by the eigenspectrum of the model's latent representation. Here, we evaluated whether the distribution of discriminative signals across spectral modes predicts the future scaling behavior, for MRI transformers trained for disease classification. We trained three supervised 3D vision transformers (ViT3D, MINiT, and NIT) for Alzheimer's disease classification using 2,822 training scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); we compared their encoder spectra with that of a frozen self-supervised DINO ViT-B/16 encoder adapted to 3D MRI. The supervised models learned highly concentrated representations, with 90-96% of CLS-token variance captured by a single principal component, whereas DINO distributed signal across many latent directions. Via spectral expansion of the Mahalanobis signal, we found that supervised training concentrated disease information into a single dominant mode, while self-supervised training produced a richer spectral geometry with higher effective rank and discoverability. This led to different scaling behavior: supervised models exhibited flatter

Indexed as

Mahalanobis DistanceScaling LawsSelf-Supervised LearningSpectral ConcentrationVision TransformerZeta Law

Identifiers

PMID42539283
PMCPMC13420447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.