ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Detergent selection as a determinant of protein melting behavior and drug-target interaction-calling in thermal stability proteomics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) and proteome integral solubility alteration (PISA) assays measure drug-target interactions by monitoring protein thermal stability across the proteome. While detergents are routinely used in lysate-based thermal profiling, the field lacks consensus on whether detergents should be present during the melting step or only added afterward as an extraction buffer, and whether detergent identity matters for this choice. Here, we evaluate how commonly used detergents and the timing of their use in thermal stability workflows affect proteome-wide thermal stability and PISA hit calling in TF-1 lysates. We find that NP-40 and DDM produce highly correlated melting profiles when used exclusively as post-melt extraction buffers, but diverge substantially when present during the melting step. DDM in particular prevents the thermally-induced loss in solubility of large classes of proteins, such as cell surface proteins, and these effects propagate directly into PISA hit calling. Performing the PISA melt in DDM versus NP-40 results in the gain and loss of distinct drug-target interactions for both the PAK4 inhibitor PF-3758309 and the PLK1 inhibitor volasertib. Notably, DDM enables detection of a volasertib-TMEM97 interaction that was previously not detected in NP-40. However, we also find that the stabilization effects of DDM mask the identification of some known PISA hits for these drugs. We further introduce a four-parameter logistic model of protein melting to aid in modeling of these findings and a linear regression framework for PISA hit calling that outperforms pairwise t-tests in low-replicate settings. Together, these results establish detergent selection as a tunable experimental variable in thermal profiling and suggest that some drug-target engagements previously attributed exclusively to intact-cell context may be recoverable in lysates with appropriate buffer conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.