ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)
Comparing the Accessibility of Information Regarding Integrated Abortion Training for Family Medicine and Obstetrics/Gynecology Residency Applicants.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, the U.S. health care workforce faces challenges responding to the critical reduction to access of abortion services. A recent study identified only 3,550 clinicians providing abortions; a majority identified their specialty as obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN, 72%), family medicine (9%), and advanced practice registered nurses (8%). Integrated abortion training during residency is a strong predictor of future abortion provisions. We evaluated publicly accessible information about residency programs with integrated abortion training that applicants could access. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of integrated abortion training family medicine residencies (RHEDI) and OBGYN residencies (Ryan) was performed to identify which online platforms and terminology were used to indicate a program offers integrated abortion training. Result: There are 34 RHEDI and 104 Ryan programs. Of those, 91.3% of programs had information on their website regarding integrated abortion training. Terms most used by RHEDI residency websites included reproductive (70.6%), abortion (67.6%), and RHEDI (50.0%). Terms used by Ryan residency websites included family planning (88.5%), Ryan (47.1%), and abortion (44.2%). The majority of RHEDI programs are in abortion-protective states, whereas Ryan programs are more evenly distributed (79.4% and 51.9%, Conclusion: Most integrated abortion training residencies included public-facing information. Students seeking residencies that provide integrated abortion training will likely find the information on the residency webpage; however, are most successful when identifying training through websites such as RHEDI, Ryan, or Reddit. As federal legislation moves to restrict abortion care, accessible training information is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.