ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Bayesian Factor Analysis for Binary and Ordinal Phenotypes with Missingness.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binary and ordinal phenotypes are common in clinical screening and self-reported questionnaires, but many factor analysis and matrix factorization methods are only applicable for quantitative phenotypes with real-valued and/or continuous data distributions. To address this, we propose FABOr (Factor Analysis of Binary and Ordinal data), a Bayesian framework for matrix factorization in which the low-rank matrices are latent variables with continuous priors while the phenotypes are observed variables modeled with appropriate binary/ordinal likelihoods. We also develop missing not at random (MNAR) extensions of FABOr for analyzing data with structured missingness. In experiments with simulated phenotypes, we found that FABOr performs similarly to the best-performing benchmark methods on binary data at imputation and exceeds the performance of all tested benchmark methods on ordinal data. We then applied FABOr to analyze real-world binary and ordinal phenotypes from the Simons Foundation SPARK dataset on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and found that it improved imputation accuracy by up to 5% on binary data and up to 23% on ordinal data relative to the benchmark methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.