ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Dual-Filament 3D Printing of Patient-Specific CT Phantoms with Embedded Implants and Tunable Metal-Artifact Intensity.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Metallic implants such as orthopedic screws, prostheses, and dental hardware produce beam-hardening, photon-starvation, and streak artifacts that degrade computed tomography (CT) image quality, and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods developed to mitigate them require objective, reproducible benchmarking. Purpose: Objective evaluation of MAR algorithms in CT is hindered by the absence of phantoms that simultaneously provide anatomically realistic backgrounds, embedded implants of known geometry, and controllable, ground-truth-referenced artifact intensity. We present a dual-filament, voxel-level three-dimensional (3D) printing method that fulfills these requirements and demonstrate its capabilities on a clinically representative cervical spine case with embedded orthopedic spinal screws. Methods: The proposed method extends the Results: The dual-filament method reproduced patient anatomy, soft-tissue contrast, and screw geometry with high fidelity. ROI HU values agreed with patient data within ±25 HU for soft tissue and trabecular bone; cortical regions were underestimated owing to the current ceiling of the calcium-doped PLA used in this study. The tunable-artifact behavior was quantified as follows: the Gumbel location parameter μ scaled monotonically from 46.7 HU (no-metal background) to 57.1 HU (50% infill) to 90.5 HU (85% infill) for the VMI 70 keV with standard filter. High-keV VMI reconstructions substantially reduced streak and beam-hardening artifacts while preserving anatomic detail. Conclusions: The proposed dual-filament, voxel-level
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.