Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539144›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Decoding molecular distributional codes through collective instabilities.

Mason N Rouches, Dongyang Li, Michael B Elowitz, Arvind Murugan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mason N RouchesJames Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Dongyang LiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Michael B ElowitzDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Arvind MuruganJames Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.

Funding

Revealing mechanisms of specificity and adaptability in molecular information processing through data-driven modelsR35GM151211 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Arvind Murugan · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological information is often encoded in molecular variants that differ in just a few chemical traits, such as the number of phosphorylated sites or ubiquitin chain length, rather than in arbitrarily distinct species. These molecular distributions carry information about cellular state, yet reading them with conventional molecular circuits requires prohibitively many distinct sensors. In contrast, we show that collective physical instabilities can naturally integrate the information encoded in such distributions. Using an information-theoretic matching condition between an encoded distribution and a physical readout, we derive a geometric condition that any good decoder must satisfy, and establish that phase separation, percolation, and membrane curvature instabilities all approach it for biologically natural distributions while simple mass-action binding does not. Using mean-field theory and lattice Monte Carlo simulations, we find that phase separation reads the shape of a distribution beyond its mean, robustly capturing its variance and, more weakly, its skewness, whereas mass-action binding detects only the mean. Near phase boundaries the readout captures nearly all the information present in the molecular population. Finite valency, through the threshold for network formation, adds discriminatory power invisible to mean-field theory. These results suggest that cells can exploit collective physical instabilities as natural, compact, yet near-optimal sensors for decoding molecular distributional codes.

Identifiers

PMID42539144
PMCPMC13419624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.