ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Transcriptomic Profiling of High vs. Low Flow Regions of Mouse and Human Trabecular Meshwork.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork (TM) is segmental, demonstrating high flow (HF) and low flow (LF) regions. Here, we investigate transcriptomic differences between flow regions in naïve mouse and non-glaucomatous human TM tissue to better understand intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation. Methods: Human eyes (<6 hours postmortem) from two donors were perfused with a fluorescent tracer to identify HF and LF regions and fixed. In parallel, one pair of 8-month-old C57Bl/6J mouse eyes were similarly processed. Sagittal sections from HF and LF regions underwent whole-transcriptome spatial profiling. Differential expression and gene set variation analysis were conducted to identify transcript and pathway-level differences between HF vs. LF TM. Selected targets were validated by immunolabeling. Results: Genes with relevance to TM outflow were identified as significantly differentially expressed in the human dataset, including ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 ( Conclusions: HF regions maintain a more active stress response that facilitates greater outflow, whereas LF regions exhibit more matrix accumulation and contractility. This characterization of segmental flow regions can inform future studies to target trabecular outflow and lower IOP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.