ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Learning shared forecast-error structure to improve ensemble forecasts of seasonal respiratory outbreaks.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time forecasts of seasonal respiratory outbreaks are critical for public health preparedness and healthcare planning. Multi-model ensembles, which combine predictions from individual models, have become a leading approach for operational outbreak forecasting. Their success, however, depends in part on the assumption that component models make sufficiently independent errors. Here, we examined this assumption using archived real-time forecasts for influenza hospitalizations and influenza-like illness (ILI) in the United States. We found that component models with diverse structures and calibration methods shared systematic forecast errors during epidemic growth and around epidemic peaks, reflecting the common challenge of tracking rapid changes in epidemic dynamics from real-time surveillance data. Because such shared errors cannot be fully corrected by ensembling alone, we developed a deep learning framework that learns structured residual errors from historical forecasts and uses them to correct ensemble predictions. This framework improved influenza hospitalization forecasts across horizons and geographic scales, reducing the Weighted Interval Score by up to 20% at the national level and 12% across states relative to official ensemble forecasts, with the largest improvements at the near-term horizon and during epidemic growth and peak periods. We further showed that learned residual structures transferred across ensembles formed from different component models, making the approach robust to changes in model participation across seasons. The framework also improved ensemble forecasts for ILI, although gains were more modest. These findings reveal a fundamental challenge in ensemble forecasting and provide a generalizable approach for improving real-time epidemic forecasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.