ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Concept-Level Semantic Representations Remain Decodable in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aphasia is characterized by impaired word retrieval, yet most cognitive models of word production assume that underlying conceptual-semantic representations are largely preserved. This study investigated whether concept-level semantic structure remains decodable from BOLD signals in chronic post-stroke aphasia and which semantic models best explain neural representational geometry during covert semantic feature generation. Eight healthy adults and six individuals with chronic aphasia completed a dense-sampling fMRI protocol in which they viewed 57 pictured nouns while silently generating semantic features. Representational similarity analysis showed that an experiential model (Exp48) best matched neural geometry in both people with aphasia and controls, outperforming taxonomic (WordNet) and distributional (Word2Vec, GloVe) models. Using representational similarity decoding, concept identity was recovered well above chance in both groups. No relationship was found between decoding accuracy and language measures from individuals with aphasia. These findings suggest that experiential semantic structure remains robustly represented and decodable in chronic aphasia despite lesion-related language impairments, highlighting preserved conceptual representations alongside altered anatomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.