ArticleResearch square2026
Decoding Overlapping Lower-Limb Afferent Pathways from Human Epidural Spinal Recordings.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restoration of dynamic motor function following neurological injury increasingly relies on adaptive neuroprostheses, which require real-time sensory feedback to continuously adjust to a user's physical state. However, it remains unknown whether distinct afferent activity can even be decoded from highly overlapping, volume-conducted epidural fields. This challenge is particularly pronounced in the lumbosacral enlargement, where common fibular (CFN) and tibial nerve (TN) afferents converge extensively, producing highly similar cord dorsum potential (CDP) topographies. Here, we demonstrate for the first time in humans that clinical-grade lumbosacral epidural paddle arrays capture sufficient fine-scale spatiotemporal structure to decode these overlapping inputs. Using a 32-contact array and peripheral nerve stimulation, we constructed a 42-dimensional feature space capturing distributed amplitudes, field geometry, and waveform morphology. A support vector machine decoded four distinct afferent classes (left and right CFN and TN) with a median accuracy of 90.9% ± 0.3%. Shapley Additive Explanations revealed decoding was driven by contact-level voltage patterns and temporal waveform complexity, while the geometric features contributed minimally. These afferent-specific signatures persisted even at sub-motor threshold stimulation intensities. By utilizing standard clinical arrays, this approach provides a pathway toward rapid deployment of interpretable closed-loop neuromodulation, avoiding the surgical risks of penetrating or peripheral interfaces.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.