Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539111›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Decoding Overlapping Lower-Limb Afferent Pathways from Human Epidural Spinal Recordings.

Alexander G Steele, Milton O Candela, Gracie J Hufft, Amanda Howes-Keith, Catherine Martin, Jeonghoon Oh, Amir H Faraji, Dimitry G Sayenko

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander G SteeleCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-0638
Milton O CandelaCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Gracie J HufftCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Amanda Howes-KeithCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Catherine MartinCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Jeonghoon OhCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9185-7362
Amir H FarajiCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Dimitry G SayenkoCenter for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Harnessing Neuroplasticity of Postural Sensorimotor Networks Using Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation to Maximize Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS119587 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Dimitry Sayenko · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoration of dynamic motor function following neurological injury increasingly relies on adaptive neuroprostheses, which require real-time sensory feedback to continuously adjust to a user's physical state. However, it remains unknown whether distinct afferent activity can even be decoded from highly overlapping, volume-conducted epidural fields. This challenge is particularly pronounced in the lumbosacral enlargement, where common fibular (CFN) and tibial nerve (TN) afferents converge extensively, producing highly similar cord dorsum potential (CDP) topographies. Here, we demonstrate for the first time in humans that clinical-grade lumbosacral epidural paddle arrays capture sufficient fine-scale spatiotemporal structure to decode these overlapping inputs. Using a 32-contact array and peripheral nerve stimulation, we constructed a 42-dimensional feature space capturing distributed amplitudes, field geometry, and waveform morphology. A support vector machine decoded four distinct afferent classes (left and right CFN and TN) with a median accuracy of 90.9% ± 0.3%. Shapley Additive Explanations revealed decoding was driven by contact-level voltage patterns and temporal waveform complexity, while the geometric features contributed minimally. These afferent-specific signatures persisted even at sub-motor threshold stimulation intensities. By utilizing standard clinical arrays, this approach provides a pathway toward rapid deployment of interpretable closed-loop neuromodulation, avoiding the surgical risks of penetrating or peripheral interfaces.

Identifiers

PMID42539111
PMCPMC13419598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.