ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Spatially unitized associations occupy an intermediate position along the item-to-association continuum in older adults.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Older adults show disproportionate impairments in associative memory relative to memory for individual items. Unitization, the process by which discrete elements are encoded as a single integrated representation, has been proposed to mitigate this deficit by reducing reliance on hippocampal binding and shifting processing toward perirhinal cortex-mediated item-based encoding. However, most prior work has not included a single item baseline, leaving unclear whether unitized associations are truly processed like items. Here, we investigated whether spatial proximity supports associative memory in older adults and how this benefit is reflected in medial temporal lobe (MTL) encoding activity. Participants encoded unrelated object pairs presented either proximally (spatially integrated) or distally (spatially separated), alongside a single item condition. Behaviorally, older adults showed better memory for proximal than distal pairs, though performance remained below that of single items. Neurally, MTL activity scaled with associative demand, with hippocampal activity increasing and perirhinal activity decreasing as demand increased. Results further revealed an anterior-posterior MTL dissociation, with proximal pairs sharing neural properties with both single items and distal pairs without uniquely recruiting either. Furthermore, hippocampal patterns reliably distinguished item from associative encoding, and the parahippocampal cortex discriminated all three conditions, indicating that the item-associative structure of the MTL was preserved in aging. Together, these findings suggest that proximal pairs occupy an intermediate position between item and associative representations within an intact MTL architecture, and that spatial proximity benefits associative memory in older adults by partially, but not fully, shifting associative demands toward item-based processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.