ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Deep Learning Based Cross-Modality Histological Brain Section Registration in Multiple Species Using Synthetic Images.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale brain mapping increasingly relies on integrating histological imaging datasets within standardized anatomical reference frameworks. To accomplish this, registration techniques are used to align imaging datasets between different modalities or to reference atlases. Deep learning approaches have emerged a fast and scalable framework for approaching this challenge, but such methods typically require large annotated datasets that are unavailable in this setting. To address this, we developed a framework for training a convolutional neural network for this task using entirely simulated data. We show that the same approach can be used for different species (mouse and marmoset), and we provide accuracy validation in terms of Dice and Hasudroff distance between anatomical regions in comparison to an alternative method. This approach has the potential to accelerate large or high throughput studies of brain anatomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.