Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538906›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Lack of specificity of planarian progenitor responses to injury in regeneration.

Cecilia E Pellegrini, Peter W Reddien

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cecilia E PellegriniHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3344-3449
Peter W ReddienHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5569-333X

Funding

Stem cell and regeneration regulatory mechanisms in planariansR35GM145345 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI PETER REDDIEN · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration is the process by which organisms replace lost body parts. How cell-type production is tailored to match the identity of missing tissues is a central problem of regeneration. Here, we investigated the specificity of planarian stem-cell responses to the identity of missing tissues following injury. Proximal injury not affecting the mature tissue nonetheless drives increased cell incorporation into brain neurons, ventral nerve cords, pharynx muscle and neurons. Following direct injury, peripheral neurons show a spatially imprecise, generic amplification of incorporation relative to the injury; body-wall muscle incorporation was amplified, with decreased incorporation at wound-distal sites in favor of increased incorporation wound-proximally. By contrast, essentially no stem-cell division contributes to initial epidermal regeneration, instead post-mitotic progenitors supply the wound. Amplification of epidermal incorporation following injury does occur weeks after injury, including to uninjured regions. These results indicate that the identity of the missing mature tissue is not required in determining the stem-cell response to injury. We suggest that planarian regeneration specificity involves a combination of ongoing cell turnover, wound-associated amplification of stem-cells, and spatially broad neoblast specification zones.

Indexed as

bystander effectfeedbackplanariaregenerationregeneration specificitytarget blind

Identifiers

PMID42538906
PMCPMC13419396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.