Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538900›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Epidermal and ECM Damage Following Pinch Injury Restricts Dendrite Regeneration in

Mia A Brantley, Avantika Pandiyan, Annie C Danh, Sydney E Prange, Dario S Rimicci, Katherine L Thompson-Peer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Avantika Pandiyan
Annie C Danh
Katherine L Thompson-PeerORCID 0000-0002-4200-3870

Funding

Mechanisms of Dendrite Regeneration after InjuryR00NS097627 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THOMPSON-PEER, KATHERINE LOUISE · 2019 to 2021
$744k
Zeiss LSM 980 NLO Confocal Microscope with Airyscan2 for UCI Optical Biology CoreS10OD032327 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WARRIOR, RAHUL · 2022 to 2022
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD032327NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS097627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal dendrites can be injured by a number of insults, but the cellular mechanism by which dendrites respond to tissue injury and undergo repair is poorly understood. Much of the field's progress has evaluated dendrite regeneration following laser injury. While precise, laser injury does not accurately model the real-world damage to surrounding tissue that would accompany neuronal injury. Here, we modify a pinch injury technique to injure both the dendrites and their surrounding tissues in Significance Statement: Neuronal dendrites are injured in clinical conditions, such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, and neonatal hypoxia. Dendrites also degenerate in the early stages of a number of neurodegenerative diseases. The role of surrounding tissues in dendrite regeneration is poorly characterized, especially considering that neuronal injury is typically accompanied by broad tissue damage. Our data evaluates dendrite regeneration following an injury that better mirrors real-world conditions and demonstrates that broad tissue damage diminishes a neuron's capacity to regenerate its dendrites. Our findings show that neurons preferentially regrow into intact, undamaged tissue environments, addressing a large gap in the field's knowledge: how damage to the surrounding tissue limits neuron regeneration after injury. Visual Abstract:

Identifiers

PMID42538900
PMCPMC13419378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.