ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2026
Evaluating the Impact of Clonidine and Midazolam Premedication on Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Patients.
Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Impact of Clonidine and Midazolam Premedication on Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Patients.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative anxiety is common in children and is associated with emergence delirium-a distressing postoperative complication characterized by agitation and disorientation. Midazolam has long been the drug of choice for preoperative anxiolysis. More recently, α
methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data pooled from 10 clinical studies, comprising data from 4796 general anesthetics in children (0-16 years). The studies were carried out at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Perth, Australia. We assessed the impact of premedication with clonidine or midazolam on the incidence of emergence delirium using validated scales.
resultsIn this cohort, with a mean age of 6.8 (range: 0.03-16.97), 331 children received clonidine and 731 received midazolam. Overall, the incidence of emergence delirium was 6%. Primary propensity score-matched analyses found no significant association between clonidine (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.65-2.16) or midazolam (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.79-1.92) and emergence delirium. In our secondary adjusted logistic regression models, midazolam was associated with increased odds of emergence delirium, whereas clonidine showed no statistically significant association overall.
conclusionsThe overall incidence of emergence delirium was low. While clonidine showed no statistically significant association with emergence delirium, our secondary multivariate analysis suggests midazolam might be associated with an increased risk of emergence delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.