Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538752›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026

Biomarker-Based Diagnosis and Care Pathways for Alzheimer's Disease in the Era of Disease-Modifying Treatments: A Consensus Statement by Belgian Experts.

Tim Van Langenhove, Sara Van Mossevelde, Marijke Miatton, Jan De Lepeleire, Rose Bruffaerts, Jean Christophe Bier, Kurt Segers, Jurn Verschraegen, Mirko Petrovic, Manfredi Ventura and 22 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Tim Van LangenhoveCognitive Center, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Sara Van MosseveldeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marijke MiattonCognitive Center, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan De LepeleireDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rose BruffaertsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jean Christophe BierDepartment of Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Kurt SegersDepartment of Neurology and Geriatrics, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Jurn VerschraegenExpertisecentrum Dementie Vlaanderen vzw, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mirko PetrovicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-8646
Manfredi VenturaDepartment of Neurosciences, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Haroun JedidiDepartment of Neurology, Valdor Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Ingo BeyerGeriatric Hospital Scheutbos (Silva Medical), Brussels, Belgium.
Eric MormontDepartment of Neurology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-2103
Rik VandenbergheDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aline DelvaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Christian GillesCognitive and Behavioral Geriatrics, Vivalia, Libramont-Chevigny, Belgium.
Donatienne Van WeehaegheDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Gaëtane PicardDepartment of Neurology, Clinique Saint-Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium.
Peter De DeynDepartment of Neurology, Memory Clinic Antwerp, Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mélanie StraussDepartment of Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Evert ThieryDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Eric SalmonMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Gert CypersCenter for Neurology and Cognitive Disorders, Aalst, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5580-4688
Joris VlaemynckDepartment of Geriatrics, Centre for Cognitive Disorders, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV, Brugge, Belgium.
Katrin GillisCentre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Jan VersijptDepartment of Neurology and Bru-BRAIN, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-5715
Maria BjerkeNeuroprotection and Neuromodulation (NEUR) Research Group, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-6462
Anne SiebenTranslational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bernard HanseeuwInstitute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-6778
Sebastiaan EngelborghsDepartment of Neurology and Bru-BRAIN, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivier DeryckDepartment of Neurology, AZ St-Lucas, Brugge, Belgium.
BeDeCo members

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recent approval of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) marks a major shift in clinical practice. Biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology is now required alongside clinical assessment, and blood-based tests are improving accessibility. This creates increased demand for timely and accurate diagnosis while avoiding overdiagnosis in low-probability cases. This Belgian consensus aims to guide biomarker-based diagnosis of AD in the era of DMTs and to highlight the system adaptations required for safe and equitable implementation. Belgium, with universal healthcare but regionally organised dementia care, provides a relevant case to illustrate both opportunities and challenges.

methodsThis consensus was developed by 31 experts in cognitive neurology, geriatrics, neuropsychology, neuroimaging, neurochemistry, and primary care, coordinated by the Belgian Dementia Council (BeDeCo). Recommendations were based on multidisciplinary discussion, current evidence, and the organisation of dementia care in Belgium.

resultsThe consensus outlines a stepwise diagnostic approach that integrates clinical assessment with biomarker confirmation using cerebrospinal fluid, amyloid-PET, and emerging blood-based tests. We review the strengths and limitations of each modality and provide guidance for use across clinical scenarios. Using Belgium as a case example, we illustrate challenges that are shared across European healthcare systems, such as limited reimbursement, unequal access to expertise, and insufficient diagnostic capacity, and formulate pragmatic recommendations to address these issues.

conclusionsThis consensus offers practical guidance for embedding biomarker-based diagnostic strategies into clinical care. By outlining structured pathways and system-level priorities, it facilitates safe, feasible, and equitable implementation of DMTs for AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersBelgiumHumansBiomarkersAlzheimer's diseasebiomarkerscare pathwaysdiagnosisdisease‐modifying therapy

Identifiers

PMID42538752
PMCPMC13428181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.