SynthesisCritical care explorations2026
IgM-Enriched Immunoglobulin As Adjunctive Therapy in Adult Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate randomized adult evidence on adjunctive immunoglobulin M (IgM)-enriched immunoglobulin for sepsis and septic shock, with emphasis on short-term mortality, endpoint heterogeneity, statistical robustness, and harms reporting. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 2025. Reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews were screened, forward citation searching was performed, and study registers were checked for additional records. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials enrolling adults with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock were eligible when they evaluated an IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparation in addition to standard care and reported extractable mortality or clinically relevant outcomes. The protocol-concordant core synthesis included English-language adult Pentaglobin trials with extractable short-term mortality data. Two post hoc extensions were labeled explicitly: a language-inclusive Pentaglobin sensitivity analysis and an exploratory formulation-class analysis incorporating the phase II Concentrated IgM for Application (CIGMA) trimodulin trial. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened records, assessed full texts, extracted study characteristics, endpoint timing, mortality events, and reported adverse events, and resolved disagreements by discussion or third-reviewer adjudication. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials, and certainty was judged with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation principles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six English-language randomized Pentaglobin trials with extractable short-term mortality data (411 participants) contributed to the protocol-concordant core synthesis. The primary pooled estimate was directionally favorable but statistically inconclusive (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39-1.07; I2 = 9%). Restriction to exact 28-day mortality also remained inconclusive (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50-1.43; I2 = 0%). An alternative risk-ratio model was similarly nonsignificant (risk ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.06; I2 = 0%). Statistically significant estimates arose only in exploratory post hoc analyses: the language-inclusive Pentaglobin sensitivity analysis (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; I2 = 16%) and the exploratory formulation-class model including CIGMA (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94; I2 = 5%). Safety reporting was incomplete in most Pentaglobin reports.
conclusionsCurrent randomized adult evidence does not justify routine use of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin in unselected sepsis or septic shock. Direct Pentaglobin evidence remains statistically inconclusive, whereas statistically significant estimates appear only after exploratory expansion to historical or indirect formulation-level evidence. Efficacy remains unproven, but the recurrent direction of effect supports a modern, adequately powered, phenotype-guided trial with standardized day-28 mortality and rigorous safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.