Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538576›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026

Visual Responsivity in Autism: Measuring Visual Responses in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults Using Psychophysics, fMRI, and EEG.

Daniela L Seczon, Kristin M Woodard, Tamar Kolodny, Hannah M Rea, Mark Pettet, Sara Jane Webb, Scott O Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniela L SeczonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-0863
Kristin M WoodardDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3230-3494
Tamar KolodnyDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-1766
Hannah M ReaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3786-9725
Mark PettetDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sara Jane WebbDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-6255
Scott O MurrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-3646

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
Testing a computational model of neural responses in autismR01MH118847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRAY, SCOTT O, WEBB, SARA JANE · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS 5T32EY007031NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031NIH HHS R01MH118847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118847Simons Foundation SFARI 647415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic individuals frequently report heightened sensitivity to visual stimuli, often described as discomfort in environments with bright or flickering lights. These experiences are hypothesized to reflect underlying differences in sensory gain or neural hyperexcitability; however, findings across studies have yielded mixed results, likely due to methodological variability. This study aimed to evaluate whether group differences in contrast-dependent neural and behavioral responses to a visual stimulus would be observed across complementary methods: psychophysics, fMRI, and EEG. Thirty-one autistic and twenty-seven non-autistic adults completed experimental sessions in which they passively viewed bilaterally presented 6 Hz counterphase flickering checkerboards at high (100%) and low (2%) contrast. Neural responses were measured using the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal from fMRI and steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) from EEG. Contrast robustly modulated responses across experiments, eliciting higher neural responses; however, no group differences emerged in BOLD or behavioral thresholds. The only significant group difference was observed in SSVEP amplitudes, with autistic individuals showing significantly higher neural entrainment to the flickering stimulus than their non-autistic counterparts. Moreover, SSVEP amplitudes were associated with BOLD responses to the same low contrast visual stimulus, suggesting convergence between frequency-locked EEG responses and hemodynamic activity. SSVEP amplitudes were additionally associated with self-reported measures of hypersensitivity, linking heightened neural entrainment to individual differences in sensory experiences. They also showed a differential relationship with perceptual thresholds across groups. These findings show that differences between autistic and non-autistic participants were more evident in frequency-locked neural responses to periodic visual input, as measured by SSVEPs, and that these responses were meaningfully related to visual cortical BOLD activity and sensory hypersensitivity.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualMagnetic Resonance ImagingPsychophysicsVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42538576
PMCPMC13599697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.