Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538562›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2026

Choosing to take it cool: a pilot study on changes in gestating sows laying area preference when given access to resting areas with floor-cooling during summer heat.

Axel Sannö, Cecilia Hagberg, Anna Wallenbeck, Niclas Högberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Axel SannöDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO-Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. axel.sanno@slu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-1041
Cecilia HagbergDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO-Box 7024, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna WallenbeckDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO-Box 7024, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Niclas HögbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO-Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat stress is an increasing concern in pig production as ambient temperatures rise due to climate change. Pigs have limited physiological capacity to dissipate heat and rely largely on behavioural strategies to regulate body temperature. Floor cooling has therefore gained interest as a potential method to alleviate heat stress, particularly since pigs spend large proportions of time lying down. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether underfloor cooling influenced lying area preference of gestating sows during warm summer conditions. The study was conducted at the Swedish Livestock Research Centre, Lövsta, Uppsala, Sweden, during July 2025. A group pen (160 m²) housing 31 gestating sows included three concrete resting subsections (A-C) with a total area of 27 m². Underfloor cooling infrastructure had been installed in the concrete slab using embedded plastic tubing. During the experimental period, cold water circulation was applied in subsection A (17 °C) and subsection B (12 °C), while subsection C served as an uncooled control. Sow occupancy of the resting areas was recorded by video during 72 h before cooling commenced and during 72 h with cooling in operation (after a 72 h adjustment period). Still images taken at 30-min intervals were used to calculate occupancy (sows/m²). Data were analysed using mixed linear models. Before cooling, average occupancy did not differ between areas (0.24, 0.22 and 0.26 sows/m² in subsections A, B and C respectively). When underfloor cooling was applied, occupancy increased markedly in the cooled areas (0.44 and 0.41 sows/m² in A and B) compared with the uncooled control (0.27 sows/m²) (P < 0.001). Outdoor temperature significantly influenced occupancy in subsection A and B during the cooling period (P < 0.001), with higher densities observed at higher temperatures. These results indicate that gestating sows preferentially used cooled resting areas when average outdoor temperatures exceeded 20 °C, hence changing their preference for where to rest. Although based on a short pilot study in a single group pen, the findings indicate that underfloor cooling may be a promising strategy to alleviate heat stress however further studies are needed to examine the benefits and the motivations for the sow's changes in preference of resting area.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryFloors and FloorcoveringsHot TemperatureHousing, AnimalSus scrofaAnimalsBody Temperature RegulationCold TemperatureFemalePilot ProjectsSeasonsSwedenSwineAnimal welfareComfortHeat stressInnovationLoose-housingSwineUnder-floor cooling

Identifiers

PMID42538562
PMCPMC13428433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.