Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538550›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2026

Introducing the TOP framework: a novel phenotyping solution for collaborative phenotype algorithm development and application.

Christoph Beger, Dorothea Strobach, Ralph Schäfermeier, Franz Matthies, Konrad Höffner, Alexandr Uciteli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph BegerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany. christoph.beger@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1166-0368
Dorothea StrobachHospital Pharmacy and Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-0605
Ralph SchäfermeierInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4349-6726
Franz MatthiesInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-506X
Konrad HöffnerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-3217
Alexandr UciteliInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-5352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenotyping, the comprehensive assessment of observable characteristics, is essential for advancing medical understanding and personalised healthcare. However, traditional phenotyping methods are often manual, time-intensive, and limited in scope. To address these challenges, this work introduces the TOP Framework, a software suite that leverages a structured approach. It provides tools for the formal definition of phenotypes, their organisation into ontological classes, the creation of phenotype models for disease-specific knowledge representation, and the generation of phenotype queries for automated data retrieval and analysis. A dynamic phenotype algorithm integrates these modules to efficiently identify individuals meeting complex phenotypic criteria. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score serves as a running example to illustrate the framework's capabilities. Furthermore, this paper presents a preliminary evaluation of the TOP Framework's user experience by means of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), assessing its usability and suitability for researchers and clinicians.

resultsThe TOP Framework includes a robust implementation of a reasoner model for deriving complex phenotypes and an automated testing module to ensure reliability. The user experience evaluation yielded generally positive results on a scale from -3 to 3 (n = 11), with mean scores and 95% confidence intervals as follows: attractiveness, 1.50 (CI = (1.07, 1.93)); pragmatic quality, 1.38 (CI = (1.00, 1.77)); and hedonic quality, 1.40 (CI = (0.76, 2.03)).

conclusionsThe TOP Framework offers a novel and automated approach to phenotyping, with the potential to enhance the efficiency, scalability, and reproducibility of phenotyping studies. This advancement contributes to a deeper understanding of disease and the progression of precision medicine.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCooperative BehaviorPhenotypeHumansSoftwareAlgorithmsComputable phenotypeData-driven phenotypingElectronic health recordsHealth information interoperabilityPatient stratification

Identifiers

PMID42538550
PMCPMC13428426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.