Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538545›Full record

ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2026

Exploring and translating novel approaches targeting the choroid plexus for the treatment of hydrocephalus: a literature review.

Olivier J J Sluijters, John R Pooley, William G B Singleton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivier J J SluijtersDepartment of Neurosurgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. olivier.sluijters@nhs.net.
John R PooleyTranslational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
William G B SingletonTranslational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrocephalus is common with a mixed phenotype and aetiology. Its treatment is predominantly surgical, with temporary or permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, which does not address the underlying disease mechanism. The choroid plexus (ChP), a secretory epithelium found in all four ventricles of the brain, produces most CSF within the central nervous system and has been investigated extensively over the past century to understand its function and potential role as a therapeutic target. Past attempts at either medically or surgically controlling its rate of secretion have not significantly altered our approach to the treatment of hydrocephalus, with CSF diversion remaining the main intervention. Rodent models of post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) have advanced our understanding of choroid plexus function in health and disease. Pre-clinical experiments have demonstrated a hypersecretory response in the ChP that may contribute to PHH. Targeting the choroid plexus directly may therefore present a novel therapeutic method. These findings have led to a significant increase in pre-clinical studies exploring this hypersecretory response and how to modulate it. Translating these promising results to clinical practice will rely on the development of large animal hydrocephalus models, which thus far has been limited. This literature review discusses the recent advances in targeting the ChP as a treatment for hydrocephalus, both surgically and non-surgically, and the current barriers to further advancement of this approach.

Indexed as

Choroid PlexusHydrocephalusTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansChoroid plexusCSF diversionEndoscopic coagulation of choroid plexusHydrocephalusHypersecretionInflammatory responsePaediatric neurosurgeryPost-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus

Identifiers

PMID42538545
PMCPMC13425997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.