ArticleMalaria journal2026
Building the toolkit to address malaria resurgence and radical cure of vivax malaria in Ethiopia: a meeting report.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethiopia has experienced a substantial resurgence in malaria in recent years, with increasing case numbers and a growing contribution of Plasmodium vivax in several regions. At the same time, new evidence supporting improved radical cure strategies, including high-dose primaquine and single-dose tafenoquine, alongside advances in molecular tools, offers opportunities to address persistent transmission and relapse. Against a backdrop of constrained funding and health system challenges, a stakeholder meeting was convened in Addis Ababa in November 2025 to review emerging evidence and discuss implications for malaria control and elimination in Ethiopia. The two-day meeting brought together 38 representatives from the National Malaria Control Programme, research institutions, regional health bureaus, and implementation partners. Key themes emerging from the meeting included: (i) systemic challenges shaping malaria control, including funding constraints, operational disruptions, and climate-related pressures; (ii) uncertainty around the contribution of relapse to overall P. vivax burden and the potential role of molecular tools to address this gap; (iii) important health system considerations for the introduction of G6PD-guided radical cure, particularly regarding service delivery levels and equity; (iv) the central role of economic evidence, with substantial uncertainty around drug pricing and implementation costs; and (v) the need for strengthened collaboration between researchers and policymakers to support evidence-informed decision-making. The meeting highlighted that, while more effective tools for P. vivax radical cure are available, their adoption in Ethiopia will depend on addressing key evidence gaps, particularly around relapse burden, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness. Given the current challenges, there is a pressing need for context specific research and continued dialogue between stakeholders, which will be critical to inform policy decisions and support progress towards malaria elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.