Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42538475›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026

Testing key pathways of the multi-process action control framework: factors associated with exercise identity in people living with and beyond cancer.

Hui Xiao, Ryan E Rhodes, Sarah O'Rourke, Deema Khalaf, Allyson Tabaczynski, Linda Trinh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui XiaoFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada.
Ryan E RhodesSchool of Exercise Science, Physical & Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Sarah O'RourkeFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada.
Deema KhalafFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada.
Allyson TabaczynskiSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Linda TrinhFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada. linda.trinh@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-4759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity is a prevalent concern among people living with and beyond cancer (LWBC). Exercise identity, a construct thought to be important for exercise maintenance, has received limited attention in survivorship research. Within the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework, identity and habit are key reflexive processes proposed to help sustain behavior. This study examined the applicability of the M-PAC framework in people LWBC and to identify how M-PAC, clinical, demographic, and behavioral variables are associated with exercise identity. In this cross-sectional survey, participants were recruited globally via cancer organizations, social media, and research platforms. Validated self-reported measures assessed exercise (Modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire), reflective processes (affective attitude, instrumental attitude, perceived capability, and perceived opportunity), regulatory processes (regulatory behaviors including self-monitoring, goal-setting, and action planning), and reflexive processes (habit and exercise identity). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) examined model fit and relationships; regression analyses examined factors associated with exercise identity. Participants (N = 477; Mage = 48.5 ± 15.4; 69.4% female) were on average 61 months post-diagnosis. Common cancer types were breast (29.1%), hematologic (12.0%), and gynecologic cancers (11.8%). SEM indicated good fit (CFI = 0.975, RMSEA = 0.064, SRMR = 0.038). Reflective processes were positively associated with both regulatory and reflexive processes, and regulatory processes were positively associated with reflexive processes (all p < 0.001). In the final regression model, exercise identity was positively associated with higher MVPA (β = 0.62, p < 0.001), stronger habit (β = 1.30, p < 0.001), greater regulatory behaviors (β = 0.28, p < 0.001), higher perceived capability (β = 0.39, p = 0.004), more positive affective attitude (β = 0.63, p < 0.001), and older age (β = 1.70, p = 0.006), and negatively associated with BMI (β = - 1.91, p = 0.015). Among people LWBC, exercise identity was associated with habit, regulatory behaviors, perceived capability, affective attitude, higher MVPA, older age, and lower BMI. These findings are broadly consistent with the M-PAC framework and suggest that future survivorship research may benefit from exploring strategies to support exercise identity.

Indexed as

Cancer survivorshipExercise identityHabit formationM-PAC frameworkPhysical activity maintenance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.