ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Unveiling the pharmacological landscape of geniposidic acid: mechanisms of action, therapeutic benefits, and scientific challenges.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geniposidic acid (GPA) is a bioactive iridoid glycoside mainly found in many traditional medicinal plants, including Eucommia ulmoides and Gardenia jasminoides. These plants are also commonly used in traditional diets and herbal teas throughout East Asia, particularly in China and Japan, where they are used to maintain well-being and protect the respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal systems. Despite the growing number of individual studies that highlight GPA's therapeutic potential, to date, there has been a lack of a systematic, critical synthesis of current knowledge. The aim of this review is to summarize the available information regarding the natural sources, methods of extraction, chemical structure, and biological and therapeutic actions of GPA. Data were obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as reports published up to 2025. Evidence shows that GPA exerts manifold biological activities. The pharmacological actions in various disease models, including inflammatory, metabolic syndromes, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic diseases and their mechanisms of action were discussed. The protective actions of GPA are associated with modulation of multiple cellular signaling pathways, including NF-κB, NRF2/HO-1, PI3K/AKT, FXR, and TGF-β signaling, as well as inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. However, direct molecular target validation has only been demonstrated for selected pathways, particularly FXR and NLRP3, whereas most mechanistic evidence remains based on downstream signaling observations. Although preclinical studies in cells and animals demonstrate that GPA is effective, poor bioavailability remains one major limiting factor. Furthermore, comprehensive pharmacokinetic, toxicological, safety profiling, and well-designed clinical studies are required to support the clinical translation of GPA. This review identifies knowledge gaps and outlines further research directions necessary for the development of GPA as a potential therapeutic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42538424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.